Decolonization is not a Metaphor
Decolonization is not a Metaphor is an essay authored by Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang in 2012ce that analyzes the appropriation of "decolonization" in academic and activist discourse. (NO_ITEM_DATA:TuckYang2012) They claim that decolonization must refer to the material repatriation of Indigenous being, not a class of actions they describe as "settler moves to innocence".
Decolonization is not an "and". It is an elsewhere.
- Using decolonization to describe educational reform, social justice, or shifts in consciousness dilutes its meaning and recenters settler futurity
- settler moves to innocence
- Incommmensurable Ethic:
- decolonization is incommensurable with civil rights or inclusivity project
- rupture, not reform or reconciliation
- decolonization is incommensurable with civil rights or inclusivity project
- Triadic settler-colonial roles:
- settler, native, slave
- all can reproduce colonial logics with misapplied "decolonization"
- settler, native, slave
code
BibTex entry
@article{DecolonizationIsNotAMetaphor,
author = {Tuck, Eve and Yang, K. Wayne},
title = {Decolonization is Not a Metaphor},
journal = {Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education \& Society},
year = {2012},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {1--40},
url = {https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630}
}