Skip to content

Recognition

The political framework in which a subordinate group seeks acknowledgment of its identity from the dominant power — critiqued by Coulthard and Simpson as a trap that requires performing the dominant power's genre in exchange for legibility.

Recognition is the political framework in which a subordinate group seeks acknowledgment of its distinct identity, rights, and existence from the dominant power. Charles Taylor (1994) argued that recognition is a vital human need — that misrecognition (being seen as inferior, invisible, or distorted) is a form of oppression, and that justice requires the dominant society to acknowledge the equal worth of different cultural groups.

Glen Coulthard (2014) turned this framework inside out. Writing from a Yellowknives Dene perspective, he argued that the politics of recognition is a colonial trap. The settler state offers recognition — legal status, cultural rights, land claim settlements — in exchange for legibility: the subordinate group must present itself in terms the state can process. In practice, this means performing the genre the state recognizes — the authentic traditional Indian or the assimilated modern subject. The offer of recognition is the offer to be genred: to accept the state’s character template in exchange for the state’s acknowledgment.

Audra Simpson (2014) documents the alternative: refusal. The Kahnawake Mohawks do not seek recognition from Canada. They carry Haudenosaunee passports. They govern their own territory. They assert sovereignty not by asking the settler state to acknowledge it but by exercising it — refusing the recognition framework altogether. Refusal is the practice of occupying the temporal middle by declining the binary the politics of recognition imposes.

The Kurdish case displays both dynamics. Kurdish movements in Turkey and Iran have alternately sought recognition (language rights, cultural autonomy, political representation) and practiced refusal (armed resistance, self-governance, the Rojava experiment in democratic confederalism that does not ask any state for permission). The politics of recognition offers inclusion on the state’s terms. Refusal builds institutions on one’s own terms. The difference is whether you accept the genre or refuse the casting call.

Last reviewed .

References

[coulthard2014] G. Coulthard. ().Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. University of Minnesota Press.

[simpson2014] A. Simpson. ().Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States. Duke University Press.

[taylor1994] C. Taylor. ().The Politics of Recognition. Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press.

Relations

Contrasts with
Date created