What Is Semiotics?

Studying Signs, Not Just Symbols

Semiotics is the study of signs and sense‑making.

It asks a deceptively simple question:

How do things (marks, sounds, gestures, documents, systems) come to mean something for someone, in some situation?

Instead of treating meaning as a black box, semiotics turns it into something we can inspect, model, and steward.

---

1. Signs, Interpreters, Contexts

Semiotics usually starts from three ingredients:

• a sign — something that stands for something else,
• an object — what the sign is about,
• an interpreter — someone or something for whom the sign functions.

Classic frameworks differ in emphasis:

• Saussurean traditions focus on signifier (form) and signified (concept).
• Peircean traditions talk about representamen (the sign), object, and interpretant (the effect in an interpreter).
• Contemporary semiotics often adds explicit context, media, and power structures.

In this project, we treat a concept as a structured bundle of signs, interpretations, and constraints, all living inside a semiotic universe.

For a more formal treatment of that universe, see [[The Semiotic Universe]] and [[The Stewardable Semiotic Concept Universe]].

---

2. Semiotics vs. Semantics vs. Syntax

People often confuse semiotics, semantics, and syntax.

• Syntax is about form:

  • which strings of symbols are well‑formed;
  • which annotations are allowed in a vault;
  • which data structures type‑check.

• Semantics is about reference and truth:

  • what well‑formed expressions are about;
  • how they map into some model or world;
  • how truth, entailment, and consistency behave.

• Semiotics is broader:

  • how signs circulate in practices and infrastructures;
  • how interpretation is constrained by context, power, and history;
  • how people and systems use signs to coordinate, explain, and decide.

The Semiotic Publisher lives at the boundary:

• it reads syntactic structures from a Markdown vault,
• it approximates semantic structure via atoms and closure,
• and it keeps the whole thing anchored in a semiotic perspective: concepts as stewardable, interpretable, revisable sign‑bundles.

For a focused comparison of semantics, syntax, and semiotics, see [[Semantics, Syntax, and Semiotics]].

---

3. Why Semiotics Is Helpful for Knowledge Work

Semiotics helps us ask different questions about knowledge artifacts:

1. Where did this concept come from?

   • Which tags, folders, and links constructed it?
   • Which temporal markers and provenance constraints shape it?

2. What else does it pull in?

   • Which atoms become relevant via closure (e.g. folder→tag rules)?
   • Which related concepts share a lot of semantic surface?

3. Who is this concept for, and how is it used?

   • In which workflows does it appear?
   • Which annotations suggest it is a definition, a critique, a plan, a recipe?

Working with a semiotic universe makes it possible to:

• trace how meaning is built up from annotations and context;
• compare concepts by their fragments and semantic deltas;
• evaluate how ready, rich, or connected a concept is;
• steward concepts through revisions without losing structure.

The publisher gives us a finite, computable playground for all of this.

---

4. Semiotics in This Project

In this repository, “semiotics” is implemented in a very concrete way:

• A Markdown file with frontmatter becomes a concept.
• Tags, folders, status, type, aliases, and facts become atoms.
• A graph of implications (the j‑modality) and a trace (G) approximate the closure structure of the theory.
• The result is a semiotic universe that we can export as:
  • a static site,
  • a static JSON API,
  • an RDF graph,
  • an OpenAPI description,
  • and Pandoc documents.

In other words, semiotics here is not only a philosophical stance; it is also a data model and tooling layer for working with concepts as stewardable signs.

For the concrete implementation details, see [[The Semiotic Publisher]].

---

5. How to Read and Write Semiotic Concepts

If you want to write documents that fit naturally into this semiotic universe:

1. Use frontmatter intentionally.

   • Choose a clear title.
   • Select tags that reflect conceptual roles (e.g. definition, method, critique).
   • Use status (e.g. draft, sketch, stable) to signal maturity.
   • Use type (e.g. doc, note, example) for coarse structure.

2. Link expressively.

   • Use [[wikilinks]] when referencing other concepts;
   • Use Markdown links to files that should become link atoms.

3. Annotate structure when it matters.

   • Use subjects and facts in frontmatter when there is explicit relational structure you care about;
   • Treat these as a small, concrete semiotic calculus you can query later.

The key idea: every annotation you add is not just “decorative metadata”; it becomes part of a semiotic structure that the publisher can compute with.

---

6. Where to Go Next

If you are new to these ideas and want to deepen your understanding:

• Read [[Semantics, Syntax, and Semiotics]] for a more systematic comparison.
• Read [[The Semiotic Universe]] for the mathematical fixed‑point construction.
• Read [[The Semiotic Publisher]] to see how the theory is approximated in code.
• Experiment by adding new tags, folders, and facts, then re‑running the publisher to see how the universe changes.

Semiotics becomes most interesting when it is not only described, but computed with. That is what this project is for.