<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Activity-Pub on emsenn.net</title><link>https://emsenn.net/tags/activity-pub/</link><description>Recent content in Activity-Pub on emsenn.net</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/activity-pub/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Learn With Me: Researching the Relation Between Emergence and Standardization</title><link>https://emsenn.net/blog/learn-with-me-systems-emergence-and-standardization/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://emsenn.net/blog/learn-with-me-systems-emergence-and-standardization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been watching the fediverse slowly drift from a weird emergent ecosystem into something that is starting to look institutional: standards bodies, formal processes, corporate entries, “governance conversations.” Underneath all the politics and discourse, there’s a simple systems question I want to understand:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What happens to &lt;strong&gt;emergence&lt;/strong&gt; when a system gets &lt;strong&gt;standardized&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Emergence” here is not a mystical property. Think about the early fediverse: different codebases, different moderation norms, different experiments with identity, different kinds of sociality. It was noisy and uneven, but there was a lot of room for new things to appear. People built strange instances, new posting conventions, ad-hoc content flows. That’s emergence: local actors exploring a big configuration space.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>