<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Aristotle on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/aristotle/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Aristotle on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/aristotle/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Endoxa</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/philosophy/terms/endoxa/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/philosophy/terms/endoxa/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Endoxa&lt;/em&gt; are reputable opinions: propositions accepted by all, by most,&#xA;or by recognized authorities. In Aristotelian dialectic, they provide&#xA;starting points for inquiry, not final guarantees of truth&#xA;[@aristotle-logic-sep].&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The methodological role of &lt;em&gt;endoxa&lt;/em&gt; is twofold:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;They provide shared premises that make argument possible.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;They provide targets for criticism, refinement, or rejection when&#xA;contradictions or counter-cases appear.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Using &lt;em&gt;endoxa&lt;/em&gt; means beginning from historically available judgment while&#xA;keeping those judgments revisable through argument.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
