<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>InformationScience on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/informationscience/</link>
    <description>Recent content in InformationScience on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/informationscience/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Domain Analysis</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/information/domains/knowledge-systems/terms/domain-analysis/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/information/domains/knowledge-systems/terms/domain-analysis/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Domain analysis is a framework in information science, developed by Birger Hjorland and Hanne Albrechtsen (1995), that treats a &lt;strong&gt;domain&lt;/strong&gt; as &amp;ldquo;a body of knowledge, defined socially and theoretically as the knowledge of a group sharing ontological and epistemological commitments.&amp;rdquo; Domains are not natural kinds waiting to be discovered. They are discourse communities held together by shared assumptions about what exists, what counts as evidence, and how knowledge is produced.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upper Ontologies and Knowledge Organization</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/information/domains/knowledge-systems/texts/upper-ontologies-and-knowledge-organization/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/information/domains/knowledge-systems/texts/upper-ontologies-and-knowledge-organization/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every major upper ontology divides reality by &lt;strong&gt;mode of being&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;mdash; how things exist &amp;mdash; rather than by topic, discipline, or domain. No upper ontology lists &amp;ldquo;physics,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;biology,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;sociology&amp;rdquo; as top-level categories. This is a finding, not an accident, and it has consequences for how knowledge libraries should be organized.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;four-upper-ontologies&#34;&gt;Four upper ontologies&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BFO&lt;/strong&gt; (Basic Formal Ontology) divides everything into two categories: &lt;strong&gt;continuants&lt;/strong&gt; (entities that persist through time and maintain their identity &amp;mdash; objects, qualities, roles) and &lt;strong&gt;occurrents&lt;/strong&gt; (entities that unfold in time &amp;mdash; processes, events, temporal regions). BFO became ISO/IEC 21838-2 in 2020. It is deliberately minimal: 36 classes, no domain content, designed as a top-level framework that domain ontologies extend. Its philosophical lineage runs through Aristotelian substance ontology.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
