<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Literary-Theory on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/literary-theory/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Literary-Theory on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/literary-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Bakhtin Circle</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/texts/bakhtin-circle/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/texts/bakhtin-circle/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Bakhtin Circle is a group of Russian-Soviet thinkers active from the 1920s onward, principally &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../humanities/domains/general/domains/people/mikhail-bakhtin.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Mikhail Bakhtin&lt;/a&gt; (1895–1975) and &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../humanities/domains/general/domains/people/valentin-voloshinov.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Valentin Voloshinov&lt;/a&gt; (1895–1936). Their work treats the &lt;a href=&#34;../terms/sign.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;sign&lt;/a&gt; not as a stable element in a structural system but as a site of social contest — an arena where competing ideological accents struggle for dominance. The tradition foregrounds &lt;a href=&#34;../terms/dialogism.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;dialogism&lt;/a&gt;, the utterance, and the social life of the word.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;methods-and-approach&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#methods-and-approach&#34; class=&#34;heading-anchor&#34; aria-label=&#34;Link to this section&#34;&gt;¶&lt;/a&gt;Methods and approach&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The Bakhtin Circle developed its semiotic theory in explicit opposition to &lt;a href=&#34;./saussurean-semiology.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Saussurean&lt;/a&gt; &amp;ldquo;abstract objectivism&amp;rdquo; — the treatment of language as a self-contained system of differences. Voloshinov&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Marxism and the Philosophy of Language&lt;/em&gt; (1929) argued that Saussure&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;langue&lt;/em&gt; is an abstraction from the living reality of speech, which is always situated, socially oriented, and ideologically charged [@voloshinov_MarxismPhilosophyLanguage_1929].&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>dialogism</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/terms/dialogism/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/terms/dialogism/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dialogism is the principle that every utterance is oriented toward other utterances — that meaning is constituted through the encounter between voices, not within a single speaker&amp;rsquo;s intention.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The concept is central to the &lt;a href=&#34;../schools/bakhtin-circle.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Bakhtin Circle&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rsquo;s semiotic theory. &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../humanities/domains/general/domains/people/mikhail-bakhtin.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Mikhail Bakhtin&lt;/a&gt; argued that no word arrives in a vacuum. Every word has already been used by others, carries their accents and intentions, and enters a field of existing discourse that shapes its meaning. To speak is always to respond — to prior utterances, to anticipated counter-responses, to the social languages that saturate every word with evaluative orientation [@bakhtin_DialogicImagination_1981].&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>French Semiology</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/texts/french-semiology/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/science/domains/linguistics/domains/semiotics/texts/french-semiology/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;French semiology is the tradition that extended &lt;a href=&#34;./saussurean-semiology.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Saussurean semiology&lt;/a&gt; from linguistics into the analysis of cultural sign systems. Its central figures are &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../humanities/domains/general/domains/people/roland-barthes.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Roland Barthes&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../humanities/domains/general/domains/people/louis-hjelmslev.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;Louis Hjelmslev&lt;/a&gt;, with significant contributions from A. J. Greimas and Julia Kristeva. The tradition treats culture — advertising, fashion, photography, cuisine, narrative — as a system of &lt;a href=&#34;../terms/sign.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;signs&lt;/a&gt; that can be read for its ideological operations.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;methods-and-approach&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#methods-and-approach&#34; class=&#34;heading-anchor&#34; aria-label=&#34;Link to this section&#34;&gt;¶&lt;/a&gt;Methods and approach&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;French semiology builds on Saussure&amp;rsquo;s structural framework but extends it in two directions: (1) from language to culture, treating non-linguistic sign systems as analyzable through the same structural methods; and (2) from first-order to higher-order signification, revealing how meaning is layered to naturalize ideology.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
