<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Media on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/media/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Media on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/media/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Prairieland Trial and the Institutional Capture of Zines</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/domains/zines/prairieland-trial-and-institutional-capture-of-zines/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/domains/zines/prairieland-trial-and-institutional-capture-of-zines/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The prairieland trial is producing an effect on &lt;a href=&#34;../../../terms/zine.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;zine&lt;/a&gt; culture that has gone largely unnoticed: it is making zines into something that non-regressive educational and NGO institutions feel they &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; produce. This is not because the trial concerns zines directly, but because of how zines were mobilized during earlier phases of the prosecution. Educational and NGO executives invoked zine production as evidence of institutional legitimacy — as proof that their organizations operated in good faith, served communities, and facilitated grassroots expression. The zine, in this context, functioned as a credential: a material artifact that demonstrated an institution&amp;rsquo;s proximity to the communities it claims to serve.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Prairieland Trial as Cultural Governance</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/legalism/domains/american-law/texts/prairieland-trial-as-cultural-governance/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/legalism/domains/american-law/texts/prairieland-trial-as-cultural-governance/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The prairieland trial merits analysisn&amp;rsquo;t for what it adjudicates but for what it produces. The prosecution has generated a set of effects on &lt;a href=&#34;../../../../../../media/terms/zine.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;zine&lt;/a&gt; culture — and, by extension, on the broader ecology of subcultural media — that operate independently of the trial&amp;rsquo;s outcome. These effects proceed from the evidentiary logic of the proceeding itself: from what was entered as evidence, what that evidence was taken to demonstrate, and what institutional behaviors the evidentiary framework now incentivizes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baseball Cap as Crown and Code</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/texts/baseball-cap-as-crown-and-code/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/texts/baseball-cap-as-crown-and-code/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Look at someone&amp;rsquo;s hat and you&amp;rsquo;ll know a little bit about them. Not everything—but something. A place. A team. A vibe. A memory. A moment. The baseball cap doesn&amp;rsquo;t cover identity. It broadcasts it. And that&amp;rsquo;s been its secret power from the start.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Originally, it was pure function. The mid-1800s saw baseball players squinting under the sun. The solution? Stitch on a brim. Protect the eyes. Standardize the look. By the 1950s, the modern cap was born: stiff front, curved bill, embroidered logo. Utility, with just enough flair to spark imitation. That&amp;rsquo;s when fans started wearing them too—not just to support the team, but to belong to something.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hoodies as History</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/texts/hoodies-as-history/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/media/texts/hoodies-as-history/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The hoodie isn&amp;rsquo;t just something you throw on when it&amp;rsquo;s cold. It&amp;rsquo;s kind of like a superhero costume for real life. One piece of clothing, a million moods. It can make you feel cozy, invisible, bold, or protected. And whether you know it or not, every time someone puts one on, they&amp;rsquo;re stepping into a story that started long before TikTok, iPads, or even the internet.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Back in the 1930s—yep, almost a hundred years ago—hoodies were made for workers in freezing warehouses. They weren&amp;rsquo;t stylish. They weren&amp;rsquo;t cool. They were just warm. A hood, a thick sweatshirt, a big front pocket: that was it. Simple. Strong. No zippers, no logos, no drip—just gear for people doing real work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Socially ontogenic media</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/cybernetic-postliberalism/terms/socially-ontogenic-media/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/cybernetic-postliberalism/terms/socially-ontogenic-media/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;socially-ontogenic-media&#34;&gt;Socially ontogenic media&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A surgeon in a war zone cracks a joke while amputating a leg. The audience laughs — not because it is funny, but because &lt;em&gt;M*A*S*H&lt;/em&gt; has spent seasons teaching them that laughter is how you survive a system that processes bodies without pause. The show does not explain how to cope with war. It does not argue a position on war. It models a way of &lt;em&gt;being&lt;/em&gt; inside war&amp;rsquo;s contradictions: ironic, compassionate, rhythmically attuned to crisis that never resolves. The viewer does not learn a lesson. They internalize a posture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
