<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Paracosm on emsenn.net</title><link>https://emsenn.net/tags/paracosm/</link><description>Recent content in Paracosm on emsenn.net</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/paracosm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Babble, 2025-09-04 19:57 – paracosms and secondary worlds</title><link>https://emsenn.net/blog/2025-09-04-1957-paracosms-and-secondary-worlds/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://emsenn.net/blog/2025-09-04-1957-paracosms-and-secondary-worlds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In paracosm, the term &amp;ldquo;paracosm&amp;rdquo; refers to psychological concept developed in the 1970s, after a paper by Robert Silvey LaRue and David Cohen. Reading about it, however, it seems like it is about endless variations on a theme, speaking to fiction where my understanding of &amp;ldquo;paracosm&amp;rdquo; was semi-organically emerged secondary worlds, of the sort Stephen King and H.P. Lovecraft made, with geographic overlap and timeline continuity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From what I can get (the paper isn&amp;rsquo;t open-access), LaRue and Cohen are more concerned with the method, and when the method results in one big world or many little ones, that isn&amp;rsquo;t important to them so much as how the people developing and expressing them are being affected.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>