<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Relational-Dynamics on emsenn.net</title><link>https://emsenn.net/tags/relational-dynamics/</link><description>Recent content in Relational-Dynamics on emsenn.net</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/relational-dynamics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On encoding relational dynamics in GnoPonEmacs</title><link>https://emsenn.net/blog/2025-07-24-encoding-relational-dynamics-in-gnoponemacs/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://emsenn.net/blog/2025-07-24-encoding-relational-dynamics-in-gnoponemacs/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing on from my last babble, I&amp;rsquo;d like to think about the different kinds of encoding I&amp;rsquo;m working on - but not without a tip-of-the-hat toward overcoding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I try and just babble on it, a big part of what I&amp;rsquo;m trying to do is, under it, overcode the universe, so that each node of relational dynamics has a way to be encoded, fingerprinted, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I recognize that&amp;rsquo;s an unrealistic goal, it&amp;rsquo;s the method that interests me: starting from the existing mapped network of relations and differentiating new relations by describing their differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>