<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Resilience on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/resilience/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Resilience on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/resilience/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Polyculture</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/domesticity/domains/gardening/terms/polyculture/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/domesticity/domains/gardening/terms/polyculture/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Polyculture is the simultaneous cultivation of two or more crop species in the same field, garden bed, or spatial unit. It stands in direct opposition to monoculture, replacing single-crop uniformity with intentional species diversity.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;mechanisms-of-advantage&#34;&gt;Mechanisms of Advantage&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Polycultures outperform monocultures through three complementary mechanisms:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Niche Complementarity&lt;/strong&gt;: Different crop species make use of environmental resources at different scales and times. Deep-rooted crops access water and nutrients beyond the reach of shallow-rooted neighbors. Species with different light requirements allow tall crops to shade shorter ones without direct competition. Nitrogen-fixing legumes enrich soil for non-legume neighbors. By occupying different ecological niches, species in polycultures reduce competition between them and increase total resource use per unit area.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improvisation and Resourcefulness in Emergent Disaster Response</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/critical-theory/domains/anarchism/domains/disaster-response/domains/emergent-disaster-response/texts/improvisation-and-resourcefulness-in-emergent-disaster-response/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/sociology/domains/critical-theory/domains/anarchism/domains/disaster-response/domains/emergent-disaster-response/texts/improvisation-and-resourcefulness-in-emergent-disaster-response/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Improvisation and resourcefulness are core capacities in emergent&#xA;disaster response because disasters create novel problems that cannot be&#xA;fully handled by routine plans alone [@kendrawachtendorf2006;&#xA;@quarantelli1995]. The school does not treat improvisation as a minor&#xA;exception to planning. It treats it as one of the ways communities and&#xA;organizations remain capable of acting when the situation outpaces their&#xA;scripts.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;improvisation-as-capacity&#34;&gt;Improvisation as capacity&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;James Kendra and Tricia Wachtendorf argue that improvisation occupies a&#xA;conflicted place in emergency management because it can look like a&#xA;failure to plan, even though disaster response constantly depends on it&#xA;[@kendrawachtendorf2006]. Their argument aligns closely with the&#xA;&lt;a href=&#34;../terms/problem-solving-model.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;problem-solving model&lt;/a&gt;: planning and&#xA;improvisation are not opposites, but distinct capacities oriented toward&#xA;different aspects of action.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
