<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SocialOntology on emsenn.net</title>
    <link>https://emsenn.net/tags/socialontology/</link>
    <description>Recent content in SocialOntology on emsenn.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://emsenn.net/tags/socialontology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Reification and Totality in Modern Critical Theory</title>
      <link>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/philosophy/domains/western/domains/marxism/texts/reification-and-totality-in-modern-critical-theory/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://emsenn.net/library/domains/humanities/domains/philosophy/domains/western/domains/marxism/texts/reification-and-totality-in-modern-critical-theory/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In twentieth-century critical theory, &lt;a href=&#34;../terms/totality.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;totality&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;and &lt;a href=&#34;../terms/reification.md&#34; class=&#34;link-internal&#34;&gt;reification&lt;/a&gt; form a paired diagnostic&#xA;framework. Reification names how social relations appear as thing-like&#xA;facts; totality names the method required to undo that appearance by&#xA;reconnecting parts to the structured whole [@lukacs-sep-2023].&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The pairing is methodological, not decorative. If reification is named&#xA;without totality, critique stops at denunciation. If totality is named&#xA;without reification, analysis risks abstract system-talk detached from&#xA;lived forms of domination.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;lukácsian-contribution&#34;&gt;Lukácsian contribution&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Lukács&amp;rsquo;s contribution is to make this pairing central to social&#xA;intelligibility under capitalism: fragmented appearances are not merely&#xA;epistemic mistakes but socially produced forms of experience&#xA;[@lukacs-sep-2023].&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
