Skip to content

Site

Defines Site, Grothendieck site

Let C\mathcal{C} be a small category.

Definition. A Grothendieck topology τ\tau on C\mathcal{C} assigns to each object UCU \in \mathcal{C} a collection τ(U)\tau(U) of covering sieves — subfunctors SHom(,U)S \hookrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}(-, U) — satisfying:

  1. (Maximal sieve.) The maximal sieve Hom(,U)\mathrm{Hom}(-, U) is in τ(U)\tau(U).
  2. (Stability.) If Sτ(U)S \in \tau(U) and f:VUf: V \to U is any morphism, then the pullback sieve fS={g:WVfgS}f^*S = \{g: W \to V \mid f \circ g \in S\} is in τ(V)\tau(V).
  3. (Transitivity.) If Sτ(U)S \in \tau(U) and RR is a sieve on UU such that fRτ(V)f^*R \in \tau(V) for every f:VUf: V \to U in SS, then Rτ(U)R \in \tau(U).

A site is a pair (C,τ)(\mathcal{C}, \tau) of a small category equipped with a Grothendieck topology.

Equivalently (and more concretely), a Grothendieck pretopology on C\mathcal{C} specifies covering families {UiU}iI\{U_i \to U\}_{i \in I} satisfying: (i) isomorphisms cover; (ii) covering families are stable under pullback: if {UiU}\{U_i \to U\} covers UU and VUV \to U is any morphism, then {Ui×UVV}\{U_i \times_U V \to V\} covers VV; (iii) coverings compose: if {UiU}\{U_i \to U\} covers UU and each {VijUi}j\{V_{ij} \to U_i\}_j covers UiU_i, then {VijU}i,j\{V_{ij} \to U\}_{i,j} covers UU. Every pretopology generates a unique Grothendieck topology.

Proposition. A presheaf F:CopSetF: \mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{op}} \to \mathbf{Set} is a sheaf for (C,τ)(\mathcal{C}, \tau) if and only if for every covering sieve Sτ(U)S \in \tau(U), the canonical map Hom(Hom(,U),F)Hom(S,F)\mathrm{Hom}(\mathrm{Hom}(-, U), F) \to \mathrm{Hom}(S, F) is a bijection. The full subcategory Sh(C,τ)PSh(C)\mathrm{Sh}(\mathcal{C}, \tau) \hookrightarrow \mathrm{PSh}(\mathcal{C}) of sheaves is a Grothendieck topos.

Proposition. A site (C,τ)(\mathcal{C}, \tau) is called subcanonical if every representable presheaf Hom(,C)\mathrm{Hom}(-, C) is a sheaf for τ\tau. This holds if and only if every covering sieve is an effective-epimorphic family.

Proposition. Two sites (C,τ)(\mathcal{C}, \tau) and (D,σ)(\mathcal{D}, \sigma) can give rise to equivalent categories of sheaves: Sh(C,τ)Sh(D,σ)\mathrm{Sh}(\mathcal{C}, \tau) \simeq \mathrm{Sh}(\mathcal{D}, \sigma). A Grothendieck topos determines a unique locale of subterminal objects, while distinct sites produce equivalent sheaf categories when they share the same sheafification.

Examples.

  • Topological spaces: For a topological space XX, the site Open(X)\mathrm{Open}(X) has open subsets as objects, inclusions as morphisms, and open covers as covering families.
  • Zariski site: For a scheme XX, objects are Zariski-open subschemes with covering families given by Zariski-open covers.
  • Etale site: For a scheme XX, objects are etale morphisms UXU \to X, and covering families are jointly surjective families of etale maps. This topology is finer than the Zariski topology and gives rise to etale cohomology.
  • Canonical topology: On any category C\mathcal{C}, the finest subcanonical topology. Its covering sieves are exactly the effective-epimorphic sieves.

Relations

Date created
Mathematical object
Category

Cite

@misc{emsenn2025-site,
  author    = {emsenn},
  title     = {Site},
  year      = {2025},
  url       = {https://emsenn.net/library/math/domains/topology/terms/site/},
  publisher = {emsenn.net},
  license   = {CC BY-SA 4.0}
}