Virginia Held’s contribution to care ethics is the sustained argument that care constitutes a genuinely distinct moral framework — not a supplement to justice-based ethics, not a domain-specific ethic for private life, but a comprehensive alternative to the dominant traditions in moral and political philosophy. Her The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global (2006) provides the most systematic defense of this position.

Held argues that care ethics differs from other frameworks along several axes. It treats persons as relational and interdependent rather than as autonomous individuals. It privileges attentiveness to particular others over the application of universal principles. It takes emotion — especially empathy and the responsive feeling that arises in caring relationships — as morally relevant rather than as a distortion of reason. And it treats the practices of care as the site where moral understanding is generated, rather than treating practice as the mere application of theory.

Held also develops the political implications of care ethics. She argues that the public/private distinction — which assigns care to the private sphere and justice to the public — is itself an ideological construction that serves to devalue care and insulate political institutions from the demands of dependency. Care ethics requires reorganizing the boundary between public and private: care is a public concern, and political institutions must be evaluated by how they support or undermine the conditions for adequate care.

On the relation between care and justice, Held rejects both the view that care ethics replaces justice and the view that it merely supplements it. She argues that care is the wider framework within which justice operates: justice matters because caring persons need fair terms of cooperation, but justice without care produces the hollow proceduralism that procedural liberalism names — formal equality that ignores substantive need.

Terms

Curriculum

2 items under this folder.