The refusal of work is the central practice theorized by operaismo and autonomism: the claim that the most radical form of class struggle is not the seizure of the means of production but the withdrawal of labor itself — the refusal to be productive on capital’s terms. This refusal takes many forms: absenteeism, slowdowns, sabotage, wildcat strikes, the rejection of workplace discipline, and the construction of forms of life that do not depend on the wage.

Mario Tronti’s “Strategy of Refusal” (1966) provides the theoretical foundation. Tronti argued that the working class has an interest not in managing production differently but in being done with production as the organizing principle of social life. The identification of personhood with productivity — the idea that one’s value is determined by one’s labor — is itself a product of capitalist society, not a natural human condition. To refuse work is to refuse this identification.

The concept extends beyond the factory. Silvia Federici and the Wages for Housework movement applied the refusal of work to social reproduction: domestic labor, emotional care, and biological reproduction are forms of labor that capital appropriates without wages, and the refusal to perform them without compensation (or to perform them at all) is a form of class struggle. This feminist extension reveals that the wage relation is not the only mechanism of labor extraction — unwaged labor, often organized along gender and racial lines, is equally constitutive of capitalist accumulation.

For this research program, the refusal of work connects to the decolonial analysis: waged labor is a colonial technology that reorganizes Indigenous relationships to land, time, community, and subsistence into relationships of dependence on the wage. The refusal of work is therefore not only a class practice but a decolonial one — a refusal of the relational restructuring that colonialism imposes through labor discipline.