Summary
Specifically mine the triage directory for emsenn’s ideas about how the repository should work — governance, specifications, planning, agent behavior, content organization, and process. Extract these as plans, policies, decisions, or specification amendments.
Motivation
emsenn’s triage files contain instructions, corrections, and design ideas that should be driving repository development. The general triage processing plan (0005) handles all content; this plan specifically prioritizes governance-relevant material because governance infrastructure is what makes everything else work.
Governance guidance in triage might include:
- How disciplines should be organized
- What the agent should or shouldn’t do
- How content types relate to each other
- Corrections about the formal hierarchy
- Ideas about tools, scripts, or automation
- Process improvements
Steps
- Read every file in
triage/with a governance lens — looking specifically for material about:- Repository structure and organization
- Agent behavior and instruction
- Planning and decision-making process
- Policy and constraint ideas
- Specification gaps or corrections
- Tool and automation ideas
- For each governance-relevant item:
- If it’s a specification gap → update the relevant ASR spec
- If it’s a policy → write or amend a policy file
- If it’s a process idea → write a plan
- If it’s a correction → write a decision record
- If it’s an agent instruction → update CLAUDE.md or write a skill
- Cross-reference findings with existing plans and policies to avoid duplication.
- Write a summary text documenting what governance guidance was found and how it was encoded.
Done when
- All triage files reviewed for governance content
- Governance-relevant items encoded as specs, policies, plans, decisions, or skills
- Summary text written
- No governance ideas remain trapped in triage
Dependencies
None — can run in parallel with or before general triage processing.
Log
2026-03-07 — Created. emsenn specifically requested mining triage for governance and repo management guidance, separate from general triage processing.
2026-03-07 — First pass completed. Read CCE specs, RTL, HTM,
act structure, collapse dynamics, and specification files. Found 10
architectural patterns applicable to repo management. Written up as
advisory report:
technology/texts/triage-derived-repo-management-patterns.md.
Key findings:
- RTL stratified types → content maturity field (maturity:)
- RTL recognition vs. reference → link quality standard
- RTL passive/active/medial modes → content mode classification
- Act structure → typed skill composition, application modes
- Collapse dynamics → content stability metrics, cascading stabilization
- CCE cells → directories as autonomous units with closure operators
- CCE-ABI → frontmatter schema as versioned interface contract
- HTM sheaf consistency → cross-discipline term agreement checks
Recommendations incorporated into existing plans:
- Plan 0001: AGENTS.md as closure operator specifications
- Plan 0003: policy application modes (total/partial/local)
- Plan 0010: act-based skill composition
- Plan 0012: content maturity field, stability metrics
Still needed: deeper pass through individual triage files for governance instructions, corrections, and policy ideas beyond the architectural patterns.
2026-03-08 — Second deep pass focused on semiotic-endeavor
enrichment. Surveyed engine/contracts, triage/specifications, collapse
dynamics, and theorem directories through the lens of spec improvement.
Findings written as advisory report:
technology/texts/triage-mining-for-semiotic-endeavor-enrichment.md.
Results fed directly into semiotic-endeavor spec v0.2.0 and plan 0033
candidate list expansion. Key governance-relevant findings from this
pass: no-implicit-contracts principle (engine/contracts README), policy
as structural enforcement not documentary (triage/specifications/
policy.md), introspection as aspect of method
(triage/specifications/introspection.md).
2026-03-08 — Third pass: root-level triage files. Read Untitled.md
through Untitled 10.md. Four files contain emsenn’s original analyses
directly relevant to endeavor theory: media-vs-organization (Untitled),
reification-by-noun (Untitled 1), constraint-forcing epistemology
(Untitled 2), platform robustness invariants (Untitled 5). Advisory
report at technology/texts/triage-mining-session-2-platform-invariants-and-organizational-structure.md.
Fed into semiotic-endeavor spec v0.3.0: added empirical grounding
section (9 platform invariants), constraint-forcing as method
validation mode, organization-by-naming failure mode in motivation.