Second assessment after accepting goal 006 (specify the emsemioverse endeavor) as primary goal and creating plans 0041 and 0042 for the previously unplanned theory and spec gaps.

Goal progress

GoalHorizonMovementBlocked?Ready?
006 Specify the endeavorprimaryadvancing (endeavor v0.6, spec v0.1, 7 specs exist)noyes (0041, 0042, 0033 proposed)
004 Finish methodologynearmostly met (5/6 KRs, goals now accepted)noyes
002 Planning inframidadvancing (assessment skill, board, WIP done)noyes
005 Semantic pipelinemidstalledsoft (0015 draft)low
003 Progressive automationmidpartial (MCP exists, Ollama works)soft (0015 draft)low
001 Operational autonomyfarminimaldepends on 003, 005low

Method-practice gaps

Method without practice

  • Retrospectives (semiotic-PM §3.7)
  • Satisfaction deficit (semiotic-PM §1.2)
  • Circuit breaker (semiotic-PM §3.6)
  • Cool-down periods (semiotic-PM §3.6)
  • Definition of Done (semiotic-PM §6)
  • Backlog as semantic gap (semiotic-PM §3.4)
  • Normative scope declarations (endeavor-spec §1.1)
  • Shared carrier declarations (endeavor-spec §1.3)

Practice without method

  • “Think through” plans
  • Session start procedure
  • Work routing decisions
  • Triage mining focus selection
  • Three-level pattern application

Leverage ranking against goal 006

CandidateAdvances 006UnblocksCloses gapImproves decisionsReadyScore
0041 Endeavor theorydirectly0042yes (5 gaps)yesyes5
0042 Endeavor specdirectlyyes (4 gaps)yesyes4
0033 Spec familydirectlypartiallypartiallyyes3
0039 Work procedureindirectlyfuture routingyesyesyes3
0040 Spec as measurementindirectlypartiallyyesyes3

Recommendation

Do: Plan 0041 (complete semiotic-endeavor theory)

Why: Scores 5/5. Directly advances goal 006, unblocks 0042 (spec needs complete theory), closes 5 identified gaps, improves all future decisions (the theory governs everything), ready now with decision 0005 directions.

Over: 0042 because spec needs theory first. 0033 because the umbrella should be solid before aspect specs.

Then: 0042 → 0033 → PM plans as part of the project-management aspect specification.

Diff from previous assessment

  • Primary goal 006 now accepted — provides clear evaluation target
  • All enabling goals (001-005) accepted
  • Plans 0041, 0042 created for previously unplanned work
  • Recommendation shifted from “review goals” to “complete endeavor theory” — the strategic gap is resolved; the specification gap is now highest leverage