SKILL

Review the skill at: $ARGUMENTS

Instructions

Present: Does the skill have a “What you will be able to do” section (or equivalent)?
Testable: Are the criteria stated as concrete actions (“given Y, do Z”) rather than vague understanding (“understand X”, “be familiar with Y”)?
Aligned with lessons: Do the lessons actually teach what the completion criteria claim? Read the lessons and check.
Appropriately scoped: Are the criteria achievable from the listed lessons, or do they require knowledge not covered?

Stated: Does the skill list prerequisites (or explicitly say “none”)?
Specific: For each prerequisite, does it state what specifically is needed from it?
Exist: Do the referenced prerequisite skills actually exist in the vault?
Sufficient: Do the prerequisites provide everything the skill’s lessons assume?

Linked: Does the skill link to actual lesson pages that exist?
Complete: Do the listed lessons cover the completion criteria? Are there gaps?
Ordered correctly: If lessons are presented in sequence, does the dependency structure support that order?
Independence noted: If lessons are independent of each other, does the skill say so?

Present: Does the skill have a scope section?
Honest: Does it state what the skill does NOT cover?
Reasoned: Does it explain why exclusions are excluded (not just “out of scope”)?

Present: Does the skill include a verification section?
Concrete: Is the verification task specific enough that a learner can actually do it?
Aligned: Does the verification test the completion criteria?

Trace the skill’s place in the broader dependency graph:

grep -rl "learn-$(basename $(dirname $PATH))" content/ | grep SKILL.md

What skills depend on this one?
Is this skill a dead end (nothing depends on it) or a hub (many things depend on it)?
If it is a dead end, is that intentional or a gap?