Skip to content

Homotopy

A homotopy is a continuous deformation of one map into another. Imagine two paths drawn on a surface, both starting at the same point and ending at the same point. If you can slide one path into the other without lifting your pen from the surface — smoothly, continuously, never tearing or jumping — then the two paths are homotopic, and the sliding process itself is a homotopy.

A homotopy is a continuous deformation of one map into another. Imagine two paths drawn on a surface, both starting at the same point and ending at the same point. If you can slide one path into the other without lifting your pen from the surface — smoothly, continuously, never tearing or jumping — then the two paths are homotopic, and the sliding process itself is a homotopy.

The formal definition captures this intuition precisely. Let XX and YY be topological spaces, and let f,g:XYf, g: X \to Y be continuous maps. A homotopy from ff to gg is a continuous map H:X×[0,1]YH: X \times [0,1] \to Y such that H(x,0)=f(x)H(x, 0) = f(x) and H(x,1)=g(x)H(x, 1) = g(x) for all xXx \in X. The unit interval [0,1][0, 1] plays the role of time: at time 00 you have the map ff, at time 11 you have gg, and at each intermediate time tt you have a map Ht=H(,t)H_t = H(-, t) that is partway through the deformation. The continuity of HH is what makes the deformation smooth — there are no jumps or discontinuities as tt varies.

When ff and gg are homotopic, we write fgf \simeq g. Sometimes you want to keep part of the map fixed during the deformation. If AXA \subseteq X and H(a,t)=f(a)=g(a)H(a, t) = f(a) = g(a) for all aAa \in A and all tt, the homotopy is relative to AA, written fgf \simeq g rel AA. This matters most for paths: two paths from point pp to point qq are homotopic rel {0,1}\{0, 1\} if you can deform one into the other while keeping the endpoints pinned.

Homotopy is an equivalence relation. Any map is homotopic to itself (just don’t deform at all). If ff is homotopic to gg, then gg is homotopic to ff (run the deformation backward). If ff deforms to gg and gg deforms to hh, then ff deforms to hh (do the first deformation in the first half of the time interval, the second in the second half). Homotopy is also compatible with composition: if f0f1f_0 \simeq f_1 and g0g1g_0 \simeq g_1, then g0f0g1f1g_0 \circ f_0 \simeq g_1 \circ f_1.

The concept originates with Henri Poincaré, who introduced both homotopy and the fundamental group in Analysis Situs (1895). The fundamental group π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) consists of homotopy classes of loops at a basepoint — paths that start and end at the same point, identified up to homotopy rel endpoints. Two loops are “the same” if one can be deformed into the other. The group operation is concatenation: walk the first loop, then the second. Poincaré used this group to distinguish spaces that look different topologically — a torus has fundamental group Z×Z\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} (two independent loops), while a sphere has trivial fundamental group (every loop can be contracted to a point).

The idea extends to higher dimensions. The higher homotopy groups πn(X,x0)\pi_n(X, x_0) use maps from the nn-sphere instead of the circle. A path in YY is itself a homotopy — a continuous map γ:[0,1]Y\gamma: [0,1] \to Y can be viewed as a deformation of the starting point into the ending point.

Some spaces are remarkably flexible under homotopy. Any two maps into Rn\mathbb{R}^n are homotopic via the straight-line deformation H(x,t)=(1t)f(x)+tg(x)H(x,t) = (1-t)f(x) + tg(x). Two spaces are homotopy equivalent when there exist maps between them whose composites are homotopic to the respective identities — meaning the spaces are “the same” from the perspective of homotopy theory, even if they look geometrically different. A solid disk and a single point are homotopy equivalent; a coffee mug and a donut are homotopy equivalent.

In higher category theory, homotopies become structural: they are the 2-morphisms of the ∞-category of spaces, homotopies between homotopies are 3-morphisms, and so on. Allen Hatcher’s Algebraic Topology (2002) is the standard modern reference.

Last reviewed .

References

[ref1]Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, 2002..

Relations

Date created